Skip to content
CVE IDCVE-2025-66455GitHub advisory IDGHSA-2vh9-42vm-xmv2

LMDeploy has Remote Code Execution by Pickle Deserialization via handle_zmq_recv in lmdeploy/lmdeploy/pytorch/disagg/conn/engine_conn.py

CVE-2025-66455 (GitHub advisory GHSA-2vh9-42vm-xmv2) is a critical-severity vulnerability with a CVSS 3.1 base score of 9.8, classed as Deserialization of Untrusted Data (CWE-502), in lmdeploy (PyPI). Affected versions: >= 0.9.2, < 0.16.0. It is fixed in 0.16.0.

Critical9.8Fix availableGitHub reviewed

Published 18 Sept 2026Updated 21 Sept 2026

9.8CriticalCVSS 3.1
EPSS
0.7%higher than 51% of CVEs
Weakness (CWE)
  • CWE-502Deserialization of Untrusted Data
KEV status
Not in KEV
Published
18 Sept 2026
Updated
21 Sept 2026
Ecosystem
  • PyPI
Assigned by (CNA)
GitHub_M

Summary

Source: OSV (GitHub advisory)

LMDeploy's PyTorch DistServe/PD-disaggregation control plane used recv_pyobj() to deserialize messages received through a ZeroMQ PULL socket. PyZMQ implements recv_pyobj() using Python pickle deserialization, which can execute arbitrary code while reconstructing an object.

The peer address used by the receiver was supplied through the POST /distserve/p2p_connect HTTP endpoint. An attacker who could reach an affected DistServe API server could cause the server to connect to an attacker-controlled ZeroMQ endpoint and deserialize a crafted pickle payload.

API-key authentication is not enabled unless the operator explicitly configures it. As a result, affected DistServe deployments without API keys allowed unauthenticated remote code execution with the privileges of the LMDeploy serving process.

This issue affects the PyTorch backend when PD-disaggregation/DistServe is enabled. Ordinary deployments that do not use the affected disaggregated-serving path do not expose this data flow.

Affected components

  • HTTP entry point: lmdeploy/serve/openai/endpoints/distserve.py, POST /distserve/p2p_connect
  • Attacker-controlled peer address: DistServeConnectionRequest.remote_engine_endpoint_info.zmq_address
  • Vulnerable receiver: lmdeploy/pytorch/disagg/conn/engine_conn.py, EngineP2PConnection.handle_zmq_recv()
  • Unsafe operation: recv_pyobj(), which performs pickle deserialization

Vulnerable data flow

  1. A caller submits a DistServe P2P connection request containing a ZeroMQ address.
  2. The LMDeploy engine connects its ZeroMQ PULL socket to that address.
  3. handle_zmq_recv() receives messages using recv_pyobj().
  4. A malicious peer sends a crafted pickle object.
  5. Python code executes during deserialization, before LMDeploy can perform any type or field validation.

A type check performed after recv_pyobj() cannot mitigate this issue because pickle payload execution occurs during deserialization.

Impact

Successful exploitation allows arbitrary code execution as the LMDeploy serving process. This can expose model weights, prompts, credentials, attached storage, cluster-network services, and host or GPU resources. An attacker may also modify or terminate the serving process.

Affected versions

Affected versions:

  • lmdeploy >= 0.9.2, < 0.16.0

The vulnerable P2P receiver was introduced in commit b0b705f7.

Remediation

The issue was fixed by replacing the pickle-based ZeroMQ protocol with JSON serialization:

  • send_pyobj() was replaced with send_json().
  • recv_pyobj() was replaced with recv_json().
  • Received objects are validated using the DistServeCacheFreeRequest Pydantic schema before use.
  • Invalid or off-schema messages are rejected without terminating the receive loop.

Fix commit:

https://github.com/InternLM/lmdeploy/commit/f05b4ad8bf2e2d84101a1d63b3c44fadd99223b2

The fix was released in LMDeploy 0.16.0.

Workarounds

Users who cannot upgrade immediately should:

  • Prevent untrusted clients from reaching /distserve/* endpoints.
  • Restrict the DistServe HTTP and ZeroMQ control planes to trusted cluster networks.
  • Configure API-key authentication.
  • Block arbitrary outbound ZeroMQ connections from serving nodes.

These measures reduce exposure but do not make pickle deserialization safe. Upgrading to LMDeploy 0.16.0 or later is recommended.

Technical details

Source: GitHub Advisory Database

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Critical9.8Base score from GitHub Advisory Database

Attack Vector AV
Network
Attack Complexity AC
Low
Privileges Required PR
None
User Interaction UI
None
Scope S
Unchanged
Confidentiality C
High
Integrity I
High
Availability A
High

CISA SSVC decision points

Exploitation
none
No public exploitation evidence
Automatable
yes
Attackers can automate this at scale
Technical impact
total
Full control of the affected system

CISA Coordinator assessment (SSVC 2.0.3) via CVE.org.

Affected packages

Source: OSV (GitHub advisory)

  • lmdeploy
    PyPI
    pkg:pypi/lmdeploy
    Affected versions
    >= 0.9.2, < 0.16.0
    Fixed in
    0.16.0
    Show 14 listed versions
    • 0.10.0
    • 0.10.1
    • 0.10.2
    • 0.11.0
    • 0.11.1
    • 0.12.0
    • 0.12.1
    • 0.12.2
    • 0.12.3
    • 0.13.0
    • 0.14.0
    • 0.15.0

Fix

Source: OSV (GitHub advisory)

Fix available

Upgrade to 0.16.0 or later.

Patch commits

  • f05b4adPatch commitgithub.com/InternLM/lmdeploy

    fix(disagg): use JSON instead of pickle for P2P ZMQ requests (#4804) (#4812)

    +21 −10 across 1 file

    • lmdeploy/pytorch/disagg/conn/engine_conn.py+21 −10

Release commits

The commits each fixed release tag points at. They usually bump the version rather than contain the fix itself.

  • 1208bf0Release commit0.16.0github.com/internlm/lmdeploy

Vulnerability intelligence

References

Credits

Questions about CVE-2025-66455

What is the GHSA ID for CVE-2025-66455?
GitHub tracks CVE-2025-66455 as GHSA-2vh9-42vm-xmv2.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2025-66455?
CVE-2025-66455 has a CVSS 3.1 base score of 9.8 (Critical), vector CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H.
Which versions are affected by CVE-2025-66455?
lmdeploy (PyPI): >= 0.9.2, < 0.16.0.
How do I fix CVE-2025-66455?
Upgrade to 0.16.0 or later. The fix is in commit f05b4ad.
What is the Package URL (PURL) for CVE-2025-66455?
The affected package's PURL is pkg:pypi/lmdeploy.
Is CVE-2025-66455 exploited in the wild?
CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog doesn't list CVE-2025-66455. That means no confirmed exploitation has been catalogued, not that it is safe to leave unpatched. CISA's SSVC assessment rates exploitation as "none". EPSS estimates a 0.7% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days, higher than 51% of CVEs.

Data sources

Upstream records

  • OSV (GitHub advisory)LoadedRaw JSON
  • GitHub Advisory DatabaseLoadedRaw JSON
  • OSV (CVE record)LoadedRaw JSON
  • CVE.orgLoaded
  • CISA KEV catalogLoaded

Fetched 3 days ago (10 Oct 2026, 14:54 UTC). Records refresh automatically after 24 hours.

Where each part of this page came from

Title and description
OSV (GitHub advisory)
Severity score
GitHub Advisory Database
Weakness (CWE)
GitHub Advisory Database
Affected packages
OSV (GitHub advisory)
Fix
OSV (GitHub advisory)
References
Computed by CVEminer
SSVC
CVE.org
KEV status
CISA KEV catalog
EPSS
GitHub Advisory Database

OSV and GitHub Advisory Database content is licensed CC BY 4.0. Values marked as computed or derived were calculated by CVEminer from the upstream data.