LMDeploy has Remote Code Execution by Pickle Deserialization via handle_zmq_recv in lmdeploy/lmdeploy/pytorch/disagg/conn/engine_conn.py
CVE-2025-66455 (GitHub advisory GHSA-2vh9-42vm-xmv2) is a critical-severity vulnerability with a CVSS 3.1 base score of 9.8, classed as Deserialization of Untrusted Data (CWE-502), in lmdeploy (PyPI). Affected versions: >= 0.9.2, < 0.16.0. It is fixed in 0.16.0.
Published 18 Sept 2026Updated 21 Sept 2026
- CVE ID
- CVE-2025-66455
- GHSA ID
- GHSA-2vh9-42vm-xmv2
- EPSS
- 0.7%higher than 51% of CVEs
- Weakness (CWE)
- CWE-502Deserialization of Untrusted Data
- KEV status
- Not in KEV
- Published
- 18 Sept 2026
- Updated
- 21 Sept 2026
- Ecosystem
- PyPI
- Assigned by (CNA)
- GitHub_M
Summary
Source: OSV (GitHub advisory)
LMDeploy's PyTorch DistServe/PD-disaggregation control plane used
recv_pyobj() to deserialize messages received through a ZeroMQ PULL
socket. PyZMQ implements recv_pyobj() using Python pickle
deserialization, which can execute arbitrary code while reconstructing
an object.
The peer address used by the receiver was supplied through the
POST /distserve/p2p_connect HTTP endpoint. An attacker who could reach
an affected DistServe API server could cause the server to connect to an
attacker-controlled ZeroMQ endpoint and deserialize a crafted pickle
payload.
API-key authentication is not enabled unless the operator explicitly configures it. As a result, affected DistServe deployments without API keys allowed unauthenticated remote code execution with the privileges of the LMDeploy serving process.
This issue affects the PyTorch backend when PD-disaggregation/DistServe is enabled. Ordinary deployments that do not use the affected disaggregated-serving path do not expose this data flow.
Affected components
- HTTP entry point:
lmdeploy/serve/openai/endpoints/distserve.py,POST /distserve/p2p_connect - Attacker-controlled peer address:
DistServeConnectionRequest.remote_engine_endpoint_info.zmq_address - Vulnerable receiver:
lmdeploy/pytorch/disagg/conn/engine_conn.py,EngineP2PConnection.handle_zmq_recv() - Unsafe operation:
recv_pyobj(), which performs pickle deserialization
Vulnerable data flow
- A caller submits a DistServe P2P connection request containing a ZeroMQ address.
- The LMDeploy engine connects its ZeroMQ PULL socket to that address.
handle_zmq_recv()receives messages usingrecv_pyobj().- A malicious peer sends a crafted pickle object.
- Python code executes during deserialization, before LMDeploy can perform any type or field validation.
A type check performed after recv_pyobj() cannot mitigate this issue
because pickle payload execution occurs during deserialization.
Impact
Successful exploitation allows arbitrary code execution as the LMDeploy serving process. This can expose model weights, prompts, credentials, attached storage, cluster-network services, and host or GPU resources. An attacker may also modify or terminate the serving process.
Affected versions
Affected versions:
lmdeploy >= 0.9.2, < 0.16.0
The vulnerable P2P receiver was introduced in commit b0b705f7.
Remediation
The issue was fixed by replacing the pickle-based ZeroMQ protocol with JSON serialization:
send_pyobj()was replaced withsend_json().recv_pyobj()was replaced withrecv_json().- Received objects are validated using the
DistServeCacheFreeRequestPydantic schema before use. - Invalid or off-schema messages are rejected without terminating the receive loop.
Fix commit:
https://github.com/InternLM/lmdeploy/commit/f05b4ad8bf2e2d84101a1d63b3c44fadd99223b2
The fix was released in LMDeploy 0.16.0.
Workarounds
Users who cannot upgrade immediately should:
- Prevent untrusted clients from reaching
/distserve/*endpoints. - Restrict the DistServe HTTP and ZeroMQ control planes to trusted cluster networks.
- Configure API-key authentication.
- Block arbitrary outbound ZeroMQ connections from serving nodes.
These measures reduce exposure but do not make pickle deserialization safe. Upgrading to LMDeploy 0.16.0 or later is recommended.
Technical details
Source: GitHub Advisory Database
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:HCritical9.8Base score from GitHub Advisory Database
- Attack Vector AV
- Network
- Attack Complexity AC
- Low
- Privileges Required PR
- None
- User Interaction UI
- None
- Scope S
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality C
- High
- Integrity I
- High
- Availability A
- High
CISA SSVC decision points
- Exploitation
- none
- No public exploitation evidence
- Automatable
- yes
- Attackers can automate this at scale
- Technical impact
- total
- Full control of the affected system
CISA Coordinator assessment (SSVC 2.0.3) via CVE.org.
Affected packages
Source: OSV (GitHub advisory)
- lmdeployPyPI
pkg:pypi/lmdeploy- Affected versions
- >= 0.9.2, < 0.16.0
- Fixed in
- 0.16.0
Show 14 listed versions
- 0.10.0
- 0.10.1
- 0.10.2
- 0.11.0
- 0.11.1
- 0.12.0
- 0.12.1
- 0.12.2
- 0.12.3
- 0.13.0
- 0.14.0
- 0.15.0
| Package | Affected versions | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|
lmdeploy PyPI pkg:pypi/lmdeploy |
Show 14 listed versions
|
|
Fix
Source: OSV (GitHub advisory)
Fix available
Upgrade to 0.16.0 or later.
Patch commits
fix(disagg): use JSON instead of pickle for P2P ZMQ requests (#4804) (#4812)
+21 −10 across 1 file
- lmdeploy/pytorch/disagg/conn/engine_conn.py+21 −10
Release commits
The commits each fixed release tag points at. They usually bump the version rather than contain the fix itself.
Vulnerability intelligence
Root cause analysis
Vulnerable functions
References
Advisories 4
Package 1
Other links 1
Credits
- Chenpinjireporter
- berkant-kocreporter
- beanduan22reporter
- Wernerinareporter
- AAtomicalreporter
- kta1krireporter
- professor-moodyreporter
- rollingWavesreporter
Questions about CVE-2025-66455
- What is the GHSA ID for CVE-2025-66455?
- GitHub tracks CVE-2025-66455 as GHSA-2vh9-42vm-xmv2.
- What is the CVSS score of CVE-2025-66455?
- CVE-2025-66455 has a CVSS 3.1 base score of 9.8 (Critical), vector CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H.
- Which versions are affected by CVE-2025-66455?
- lmdeploy (PyPI): >= 0.9.2, < 0.16.0.
- How do I fix CVE-2025-66455?
- Upgrade to 0.16.0 or later. The fix is in commit f05b4ad.
- What is the Package URL (PURL) for CVE-2025-66455?
- The affected package's PURL is pkg:pypi/lmdeploy.
- Is CVE-2025-66455 exploited in the wild?
- CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog doesn't list CVE-2025-66455. That means no confirmed exploitation has been catalogued, not that it is safe to leave unpatched. CISA's SSVC assessment rates exploitation as "none". EPSS estimates a 0.7% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days, higher than 51% of CVEs.
Data sources
Upstream records
- OSV (GitHub advisory)LoadedRaw JSON
- GitHub Advisory DatabaseLoadedRaw JSON
- OSV (CVE record)LoadedRaw JSON
- CVE.orgLoaded
- CISA KEV catalogLoaded
Fetched 3 days ago (10 Oct 2026, 14:54 UTC). Records refresh automatically after 24 hours.
Where each part of this page came from
- Title and description
- OSV (GitHub advisory)
- Severity score
- GitHub Advisory Database
- Weakness (CWE)
- GitHub Advisory Database
- Affected packages
- OSV (GitHub advisory)
- Fix
- OSV (GitHub advisory)
- References
- Computed by CVEminer
- SSVC
- CVE.org
- KEV status
- CISA KEV catalog
- EPSS
- GitHub Advisory Database
OSV and GitHub Advisory Database content is licensed CC BY 4.0. Values marked as computed or derived were calculated by CVEminer from the upstream data.